What are the long-term effects of Ligue 1’s export model on youth development?


  • Back when I was coaching a local U-17 team, we used to show clips from Ligue 1 to inspire the kids – especially players like Camavinga or Upamecano. But then it hit me: those players don’t stay long in France. They shine and are sold abroad pretty fast. I get that it’s good for the clubs financially, but what about development? Are these constant transfers helping or hurting young talents in the long run?



  • That’s a really interesting point. A lot of people don’t consider how the business side impacts development. There’s some good insight into this in the article: https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2025/ligue-1-and-frances-export-machine/ — it touches on how France's system is built to train and export talent. I think the benefit is that players get exposed to top-level competition early, but the downside is that not all of them are mentally or physically ready for the leap. I knew a guy who moved from Ligue 2 to a top Spanish club’s bench and kind of disappeared from the scene because he couldn’t break into the starting lineup.


  • I’m not super familiar with the youth development pathways, but I do think France seems to be one of the best at producing technically gifted players. Maybe the issue isn’t the system but how other leagues use the players once they arrive.


Please login to reply this topic!