What’s the difference between Shakespeare’s historical plays and his tragedies — where should someone begin their resear


  • You know, this question popped into my head after I completely confused Macbeth with Richard III during a literature discussion group I joined last week. Embarrassing, right? I’ve always loved Shakespeare, but I never really stopped to think about how different genres play out in his work. I thought they all just involved royal drama, death, and long monologues. But clearly, I was missing something. Now I want to dig into the real difference between his historical dramas and tragedies — what themes they focus on, how the characters are written, even what kind of political context they reflect. Any advice on how to start researching this properly without just re-reading every play?



  • I’m not super deep into Shakespeare, but I did watch a stage version of Julius Caesar last summer and it blew me away. The way the dialogue was delivered live made everything feel way more intense than when I read it in school. Sometimes just seeing it performed gives you a whole new appreciation for how layered his writing really is.


Please login to reply this topic!